SMOKIN HOT PICS OF AMANDA TAPPING

YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO HIT THIS:

Loading Image...

Loading Image...

Ken from Chicago

2006-07-13 10:45:01 UTC

Post by spankin it
http://www.elspethmac.com/rdaw/img/amanda_tapping-06.jpg
http://www.stargate-project.de/stargate/images/news/amanda_tapping_neu_big.jpg
http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF04.jpg
http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF02.jpg

Amanda was right. It' amazing how much better "Sam" looks with hair
conditioner.

-- Ken from Chicago

2006-07-13 15:58:18 UTC

Amanda was right. It' amazing how much better "Sam" looks with hair
conditioner.
-- Ken from Chicago

Eva, are you looking at this?

Tim McGaughy

2006-07-13 17:04:18 UTC

Amanda was right. It' amazing how much better "Sam" looks with hair
conditioner.

umm What?

You were looking at her hair?

Weird.

Michael Bowker

2006-07-13 18:43:06 UTC

Amanda was right. It' amazing how much better "Sam" looks with hair
conditioner.

umm What?
You were looking at her hair?
Weird.

Couldn't agree more. I'm usually against using the American flag as a
blanket, but man I can't get out of her smile. Her husband is one lucky
fellow! Also I don't see this photo as Sam, I think it's Amanda. I
wish it was a poster.

Ken from Chicago

2006-07-14 00:19:57 UTC

Amanda was right. It' amazing how much better "Sam" looks with hair
conditioner.

umm What?
You were looking at her hair?
Weird.

The long, flowing, silky smooth, spun gold waving in the breeze ... um, ...
what was the question?

-- Ken from Chicago

v***@yahoo.com

2006-07-14 09:59:49 UTC

When I clicked these links, I got this: "HOTLINKING IS THE SAME AS
STEALING! Please go to http://elspethmac.com to see the correct
image." ----- Shame on you spankin-it; stealing people's bandwidth;
what an ass.

John H

2006-07-13 21:23:35 UTC

Amanda was right. It' amazing how much better "Sam" looks with hair
conditioner.

I remember when my roommate and I actually thought of her as a babe instead
of Geekgirl. It was an ep of Stargate and she was on leave or something
because she was in civilian clothes; jeans, white tshirt and a white trench.
And we were like, "Wow, Sam's got boobies!" Ah, the days of geekhood.

john

Bill Steele

2006-07-13 19:34:59 UTC

From a few years back, looks like.

~* Magda ~*

2006-07-13 19:44:50 UTC

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:34:59 -0400, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, Bill Steele <***@cornell.edu>
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... In article <***@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
... "spankin it" <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
...
... > YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO HIT THIS:
... >
... > http://www.elspethmac.com/rdaw/img/amanda_tapping-06.jpg
... >
... > http://www.stargate-project.de/stargate/images/news/amanda_tapping_neu_big.jpg
... >
... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF04.jpg
... >
... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF02.jpg
...
... From a few years back, looks like.

At least five years. She is not that slim any longer.

Michael Bowker

2006-07-13 23:09:58 UTC

Post by ~* Magda ~*
...
... >
... > http://www.elspethmac.com/rdaw/img/amanda_tapping-06.jpg
... >
... > http://www.stargate-project.de/stargate/images/news/amanda_tapping_neu_big.jpg
... >
... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF04.jpg
... >
... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF02.jpg
...
... From a few years back, looks like.
At least five years. She is not that slim any longer.

About eight months ago.
http://cfqmedia.stores.yahoo.net/fefavol13is7.html
Femme Fatales Vol 13, Issue 7

Most likely shot six months before that. so less than a year and half,
I'd guess.

...and based on the SG-1 commercials, still as beautiful as ever.

~* Magda ~*

2006-07-13 23:25:02 UTC

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:09:58 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, Michael Bowker
<***@blueneptune.com> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... ~* Magda ~* wrote:
... > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:34:59 -0400, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, Bill Steele <***@cornell.edu>
... > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
... >
... > ... In article <***@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
... > ... "spankin it" <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
... > ...
... > ... > YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO HIT THIS:
... > ... >
... > ... > http://www.elspethmac.com/rdaw/img/amanda_tapping-06.jpg
... > ... >
... > ... > http://www.stargate-project.de/stargate/images/news/amanda_tapping_neu_big.jpg
... > ... >
... > ... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF04.jpg
... > ... >
... > ... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF02.jpg
... > ...
... > ... From a few years back, looks like.
... >
... > At least five years. She is not that slim any longer.
... >
... About eight months ago.
... http://cfqmedia.stores.yahoo.net/fefavol13is7.html
... Femme Fatales Vol 13, Issue 7
...
... Most likely shot six months before that. so less than a year and half,
... I'd guess.

I have seen those pics *years* ago. Much longer than 18 months.

... ...and based on the SG-1 commercials, still as beautiful as ever.

Make-up and correct light work wonders.

Michael Bowker

2006-07-13 23:37:13 UTC

Post by ~* Magda ~*
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:09:58 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, Michael Bowker
... >
... > ...
... > ... >
... > ... > http://www.elspethmac.com/rdaw/img/amanda_tapping-06.jpg
... > ... >
... > ... > http://www.stargate-project.de/stargate/images/news/amanda_tapping_neu_big.jpg
... > ... >
... > ... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF04.jpg
... > ... >
... > ... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF02.jpg
... > ...
... > ... From a few years back, looks like.
... >
... > At least five years. She is not that slim any longer.
... >
... About eight months ago.
... http://cfqmedia.stores.yahoo.net/fefavol13is7.html
... Femme Fatales Vol 13, Issue 7
...
... Most likely shot six months before that. so less than a year and half,
... I'd guess.
I have seen those pics *years* ago. Much longer than 18 months.

Where? As far as I know Femme Fatales was where they were first published.

Post by ~* Magda ~*
... ...and based on the SG-1 commercials, still as beautiful as ever.
Make-up and correct light work wonders.

Ken from Chicago

2006-07-14 08:19:53 UTC

Post by Michael Bowker

Post by ~* Magda ~*
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:09:58 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, Michael Bowker
... > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:34:59 -0400, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, Bill
... > ... > ... In article
... > ... > ... > ... >
http://www.elspethmac.com/rdaw/img/amanda_tapping-06.jpg
... > ... > ... > ... >
http://www.stargate-project.de/stargate/images/news/amanda_tapping_neu_big.jpg
... > ... > ... > ... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF04.jpg
... > ... > ... > ... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF02.jpg
... > ... ... > ... From a few years back, looks like.
... > ... > At least five years. She is not that slim any longer.
... > ... About eight months ago.
... http://cfqmedia.stores.yahoo.net/fefavol13is7.html
... Femme Fatales Vol 13, Issue 7
... ... Most likely shot six months before that. so less than a year
and half, ... I'd guess.
I have seen those pics *years* ago. Much longer than 18 months.

Where? As far as I know Femme Fatales was where they were first published.

Post by ~* Magda ~*
... ...and based on the SG-1 commercials, still as beautiful as ever.
Make-up and correct light work wonders.

The flag one was about a year or two old.

-- Ken from Chicago

v***@yahoo.com

2006-07-14 09:51:54 UTC

One of those pictures has "99" on it, presumably the year that photo
was taken... SG1's second or third season. So she's now 7 years older
(and looks it). Back then she still looked cute; now she looks like my
grandmother (shiver).

Post by Michael Bowker

Post by spankin it
http://www.elspethmac.com/rdaw/img/amanda_tapping-06.jpg
... > ... > ... > ... >
http://www.stargate-project.de/stargate/images/news/amanda_tapping_neu_big.jpg
... > ... > ... > ... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF04.jpg
... > ... > ... > ... > http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF02.jpg
... > ... ... > ... From a few years back, looks like.
... > ... > At least five years. She is not that slim any longer.
... > ... About eight months ago.
... http://cfqmedia.stores.yahoo.net/fefavol13is7.html
... Femme Fatales Vol 13, Issue 7
... ... Most likely shot six months before that. so less than a year
and half, ... I'd guess.
I have seen those pics *years* ago. Much longer than 18 months.

Where? As far as I know Femme Fatales was where they were first published.

Post by spankin it
... ...and based on the SG-1 commercials, still as beautiful as ever.
Make-up and correct light work wonders.

The flag one was about a year or two old.
-- Ken from Chicago

Atlas Bugged

2006-07-14 10:34:31 UTC

Post by v***@yahoo.com
One of those pictures has "99" on it, presumably the year that photo
was taken... SG1's second or third season. So she's now 7 years older
(and looks it). Back then she still looked cute; now she looks like my
grandmother (shiver).

OK, but your grandma must really be something else.

I came along when my parents were over 40, so I, more than most, see parents
and othe relatives as very aged looking. Only later did I discover that
parents can sometimes be extremely attractive.

At any rate, I'm going to assume your parents obtained you when they were
young, and that the same pattern was probably repeated by their parents.

Bill Steele

2006-07-14 19:50:50 UTC

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age.

Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

Tim McGaughy

2006-07-14 20:15:02 UTC

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age.
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.

It's all downhill from 21.

Jette Goldie

2006-07-14 21:14:57 UTC

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age. Hey, if we
can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also recognize
that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Be aware that many women feel the same about men....... except
that we might put the threshhold a bit lower.

In other words, you're already over the hill, boyo.

--
Jette Goldie
***@blueyonder.co.uk
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
("reply to" is spamblocked)

2006-07-14 22:54:39 UTC

Post by Jette Goldie

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age. Hey, if we
can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also recognize
that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Be aware that many women feel the same about men....... except
that we might put the threshhold a bit lower.
In other words, you're already over the hill, boyo.
--
Jette Goldie

Why do people react so angrily over something as harmless as a
dissenting opinion?

It's very telling.

Post by Jette Goldie
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
("reply to" is spamblocked)

Tim McGaughy

2006-07-15 00:19:44 UTC

Post by Jette Goldie

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age. Hey, if we
can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also recognize
that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Be aware that many women feel the same about men....... except
that we might put the threshhold a bit lower.
In other words, you're already over the hill, boyo.

I'm fine with that. I'd have to be an idiot to try to convince myself
that I look as good as I did when I was 21. I'd also have to be an idiot
to tell myself that I can still do physical things as well as I once
did, and that the pains and aches I've accumulated are illusions.

Maturity may not always be an obstacle, but it surely is never an
improvement, unless you are talking mental maturity.

Forge

2006-07-15 02:39:22 UTC

Post by Tim McGaughy
I'm fine with that. I'd have to be an idiot to try to convince myself
that I look as good as I did when I was 21. I'd also have to be an idiot
to tell myself that I can still do physical things as well as I once
did, and that the pains and aches I've accumulated are illusions.

"Past your prime" is a myth, as any personal trainer worth his salt will
gladly tell you. Jack Lalanne is in his 80s and he's still as strong and
vital as ever. I mean yeah, he looks old of course, but he could
probably deadlift YOUR fat ass without breaking a sweat. = )

Brandy Alexandre

2006-07-15 03:36:57 UTC

Post by Tim McGaughy
I'm fine with that. I'd have to be an idiot to try to convince
myself that I look as good as I did when I was 21. I'd also have
to be an idiot to tell myself that I can still do physical things
as well as I once did, and that the pains and aches I've
accumulated are illusions.

"Past your prime" is a myth, as any personal trainer worth his
salt will gladly tell you. Jack Lalanne is in his 80s and he's
still as strong and vital as ever. I mean yeah, he looks old of
course, but he could probably deadlift YOUR fat ass without
breaking a sweat. = )

Should point out how exercise and a healthy lifestyle does so much more
for you than fad diets. Look at Nathan pritikin of low-fat diet fame
and the "longevity center" that bears his name. Dead of heart disease
by age 65. What about Robert Atkins of the low-carb diet generation?
Dead at the age of 72 from, still contested (for obvious reasons),
heart disease, while, not contested, clinically obese.

Old and out of shape has nothing to do with chronology. Why men have
long been attracted to young, fertile females for eons driven by the
urged to procreate, modern society not wanting to have children but
plenty of good sex has been steering toward attraction to older, more
experienced women of similar body type.

Tapping=hottie

--
Brandy Alexandre

--Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=

Tim McGaughy

2006-07-15 12:00:42 UTC

You're a fucking idiot.

Go on Google, look at the pictures of him when he was young and pictures
of him now. He is NOT as strong and vital as ever.

~* Magda ~*

2006-07-14 21:17:47 UTC

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:15:02 -0500, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, Tim McGaughy
<***@ispwest.com> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Bill Steele wrote:
... > In article <***@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
... > "***@yahoo.com" <***@yahoo.com> wrote:
... >
... >
... >>One of those pictures has "99" on it, presumably the year that photo
... >>was taken... SG1's second or third season. So she's now 7 years older
... >>(and looks it). Back then she still looked cute; now she looks like my
... >>grandmother (shiver).
... >
... >
... > Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age.
... >
... > Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
... > recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.
...
... No.
...
... It's all downhill from 21.

That deafening sound you hear is just all the 22+ women cheering - one down! :))

Anim8rFSK

2006-07-14 22:05:30 UTC

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age.
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

nonsense. Lots of women are just fine 'til they hit 30.

(ducking)

Atlas Bugged

2006-07-14 22:04:58 UTC

Post by Tim McGaughy
It's all downhill from 21.

That's truly, fabulously wrong. If a youthful look is your priority, and
for many it is, it actually is all downhill after about 15.

Instead we are in a truly golden age WRT older women and lookin' good. It
is the best time in history to be a guy.

The *real* distinction under this heading, god's unfair discrimination
against the gals, is their sudden dropoff at a later age.

When Nancy Sinatra posed for Playboy in her 50's, it was clear that there
couldn't be a better time to be a guy.

But at some point, even Sinatra's going to hit that point where she loses
it.

Guys, instead, go verrrry gradually into our deterioration, with exceptions
of course. The gals have exceptions too. Has anyone noticed Sally Field
recently in a commercial for a calcium supplement? That gal is going to
look sexy 'till the day she dies.

But downhill from age 21? Two words: Diane Lane. (<shortness of breath>)

2006-07-14 23:01:19 UTC

Post by Tim McGaughy
It's all downhill from 21.

That's truly, fabulously wrong. If a youthful look is your priority, and
for many it is, it actually is all downhill after about 15.
Instead we are in a truly golden age WRT older women and lookin' good. It
is the best time in history to be a guy.
The *real* distinction under this heading, god's unfair discrimination
against the gals, is their sudden dropoff at a later age.
When Nancy Sinatra posed for Playboy in her 50's, it was clear that there
couldn't be a better time to be a guy.
But at some point, even Sinatra's going to hit that point where she loses
it.
Guys, instead, go verrrry gradually into our deterioration, with exceptions
of course. The gals have exceptions too. Has anyone noticed Sally Field
recently in a commercial for a calcium supplement? That gal is going to
look sexy 'till the day she dies.
But downhill from age 21? Two words: Diane Lane. (<shortness of breath>)

Of course. She's hot-- because she's kept the middle-age weight off.

Bob

2006-07-14 23:56:36 UTC

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:04:58 -0400, "Atlas Bugged"

Post by Atlas Bugged
Diane Lane.

http://members.fortunecity.com/noops178/fcnoops_diane_lane.html

--
Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!

Atlas Bugged

2006-07-15 07:16:17 UTC

Post by Bob
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:04:58 -0400, "Atlas Bugged"

Post by Atlas Bugged
Diane Lane.

http://members.fortunecity.com/noops178/fcnoops_diane_lane.html

NICE photo colection there, a bit heavy with screen caps of UNFAITHFUL, but
that film really is stupendously sexy.

jayembee

2006-07-15 00:02:44 UTC

Post by Atlas Bugged
But downhill from age 21? Two words: Diane Lane. (<shortness of breath>)

Two more: Julie Christie.

-- jayembee

Forge

2006-07-15 02:35:46 UTC

Post by Atlas Bugged
Guys, instead, go verrrry gradually into our deterioration, with exceptions
of course. The gals have exceptions too. Has anyone noticed Sally Field
recently in a commercial for a calcium supplement? That gal is going to
look sexy 'till the day she dies.

That gal is going to look 43 until the day she dies.

Atlas Bugged

2006-07-15 07:32:13 UTC

That gal is going to look 43 until the day she dies.

That's fair. But I've no problem with 43. My problem is having fantasies
where I'm fucking the flying nun.

Forge

2006-07-15 14:02:16 UTC

Post by Forge
That gal is going to look 43 until the day she dies.

That's fair. But I've no problem with 43. My problem is having fantasies
where I'm fucking the flying nun.

Oh, I wasn't saying there's anything wrong with looking 43; Sela Ward
was holy-shit-OMG-gorgeous at 43. I daresay MOST women don't really
start looking good until post-38 or so.

Stephen Fairchild

2006-07-15 14:45:21 UTC

Post by Forge
That gal is going to look 43 until the day she dies.

That's fair. But I've no problem with 43. My problem is having
fantasies where I'm fucking the flying nun.

Oh, I wasn't saying there's anything wrong with looking 43; Sela Ward
was holy-shit-OMG-gorgeous at 43. I daresay MOST women don't really
start looking good until post-38 or so.

I guess you are lucky then since there is less competition for women of that
age group. Personally I think women's looks go downhill at 37.

--
Stephen Fairchild

2006-07-14 22:51:11 UTC

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age.
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Maybe 28. But that's cool because I'm guessing you are younger than I.

Tim McGaughy

2006-07-15 00:24:19 UTC

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age.
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Maybe 28. But that's cool because I'm guessing you are younger than I.

I doubt it.

Stephen Fairchild

2006-07-15 01:52:01 UTC

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age.
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Maybe 28. But that's cool because I'm guessing you are younger than I.

I doubt it.

I peaked at 27/28. Mainly due to my fitness regime.

--
Stephen Fairchild

Clell Harmon

2006-07-14 23:41:55 UTC

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age.
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should
also recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an
improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Wow. You just out Bobbed Bob with 5 words. Amazing.

Stephen Fairchild

2006-07-15 01:50:58 UTC

Your grandmother must have had kids at a pretty early age.
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

23 is better. You have more stamina. Physical strength can peak in some in
their thirties.

--
Stephen Fairchild

Forge

2006-07-15 02:34:17 UTC

Post by Bill Steele
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Fuck you and the horse you rode in on. My wife is [gets whacked in head
for almost saying how old she is] "over forty" and she's a seriously hot
chick. So as I said, please, go and fuck yourself, which you probably
have to do regularly with that ridiculous attitude.

Brandy Alexandre

2006-07-15 03:26:24 UTC

Post by Bill Steele
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we
should also recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and
often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Fuck you and the horse you rode in on. My wife is [gets whacked in
head for almost saying how old she is] "over forty" and she's a
seriously hot chick. So as I said, please, go and fuck yourself,
which you probably have to do regularly with that ridiculous
attitude.

Agreed. My sexy trainer of the tendere age of 24 is way hot for Amanda
Tapping. He thinks she's sexier than anything near his age or not.

--
Brandy Alexandre

--Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=

Tim McGaughy

2006-07-15 11:52:11 UTC

Post by Bill Steele
Hey, if we can respect the sexiness of non-skinny women, we should also
recognize that maturity also is no obstacle, and often an improvement.

No.
It's all downhill from 21.

Fuck you and the horse you rode in on. My wife is [gets whacked in head
for almost saying how old she is] "over forty" and she's a seriously hot
chick.

And you think she looks better than when she was 21?

You're a fucking moron.

So as I said, please, go and fuck yourself, which you probably

Post by Forge
have to do regularly with that ridiculous attitude.

You just fantasize away about my sex life. Whatever gets you through the
night, dude.

Forge

2006-07-15 13:54:13 UTC

Post by Forge
Fuck you and the horse you rode in on. My wife is [gets whacked in head
for almost saying how old she is] "over forty" and she's a seriously hot
chick.

And you think she looks better than when she was 21?
You're a fucking moron.

Actually yes she does; at 21 she was skinny and kinda gawky, like an
underweight chicken. Now she's filled out and curvy and the extra few
pounds she has compensate for the minor things going on with her
skeletal structure, like a slight overbite and a little too much chin.
She's a hot babe, dude, you ain't gonna change my mind.

And if you want a further example of "looks better older than younger,"
you might wanna compare Gillian Anderson at 21 and at 31. After the baby
she just turned fricking drop-dead
oh-my-god-I've-lost-the-ability-to-speak GORGEOUS.

jayembee

2006-07-14 21:54:06 UTC

Post by v***@yahoo.com
One of those pictures has "99" on it, presumably the year that
photo was taken...

That's a big assumption. It could also indicate that it's the 99th
photo in a series. Or some other sort of identifying mark that has
nothing to do with when it was taken. You're making a big assumption
there.

Post by v***@yahoo.com
So she's now 7 years older (and looks it). Back then she still
looked cute; now she looks like my grandmother (shiver).

(1) Your grandmother is 41 years old?

(2) Everyone's grandmother should look that good.

-- jayembee

Forge

2006-07-15 02:32:08 UTC

Wow you're high.

~* Magda ~*

2006-07-14 10:34:23 UTC

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:19:53 -0500, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Ken from Chicago"
<***@comcast.net> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... >> ... ...and based on the SG-1 commercials, still as beautiful as ever.
... >>
... >> Make-up and correct light work wonders.
...
... The flag one was about a year or two old.

At the time when the pics were taken, maybe. They were not published immediately.

RichA

2006-07-14 03:17:02 UTC

Loading Image...

&imgrefurl=http://amandatapping.free.fr/news.htm&h=1080&w=848&sz=268&hl=en&start=5&tbnid=arOAQ2urZKTm_M:&tbnh=150&tbnw=117&prev=/images%3Fq%3Damanda%2Btapping%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DG

Much better use of the flag than some leftwing piece of s--- burning
it.

trotsky

2006-07-14 10:39:27 UTC

Post by RichA
http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://amandatapping.free.fr/download/FF01.jpg&imgrefurl=http://amandatapping.free.fr/news.htm&h=1080&w=848&sz=268&hl=en&start=5&tbnid=arOAQ2urZKTm_M:&tbnh=150&tbnw=117&prev=/images%3Fq%3Damanda%2Btapping%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DG
Much better use of the flag than some leftwing piece of s--- burning
it.

How much does a Canadian have to hate his country to refer to the
American flag as "the flag"?

Forge

2006-07-14 03:14:18 UTC

Post by Bill Steele
From a few years back, looks like.

The flag pics are either '04 or '05, iirc.

2006-07-14 00:15:03 UTC

Is this supposed to be someone famous?

She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

David B

2006-07-14 01:00:54 UTC

Is this supposed to be someone famous?

Only if you're a Stargate fan probably.

Post by vr
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

Huh? She's not even close to being overweight.

2006-07-14 22:26:04 UTC

Post by David B

Is this supposed to be someone famous?

Only if you're a Stargate fan probably.

Post by vr
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

Huh? She's not even close to being overweight.

She's chunky. Not hot at all. Saggy arms, too.

Clell Harmon

2006-07-14 23:44:04 UTC

Post by David B

Is this supposed to be someone famous?

Only if you're a Stargate fan probably.

Post by vr
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

Huh? She's not even close to being overweight.

She's chunky. Not hot at all. Saggy arms, too.

Just because a woman has more meat on her body than your hand doesn't
make her chunky.

Of course that attitude does make your hand your most likely sexual
partner.

Tim McGaughy

2006-07-15 00:29:00 UTC

Post by David B

Is this supposed to be someone famous?

Only if you're a Stargate fan probably.

Post by vr
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

Huh? She's not even close to being overweight.

She's chunky. Not hot at all. Saggy arms, too.

Not in those pictures.

Personally, I don't like much thinner than that. Anorexia isn't all that
attractive.

Forge

2006-07-15 02:22:11 UTC

Post by vr
She's chunky. Not hot at all. Saggy arms, too.

I bet you're in great shape yourself.

(massive eyeroll)

TBerk

2006-07-14 02:30:51 UTC

Is this supposed to be someone famous?
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

VR, you are nutty.

Should she look like a teenage boy to look right to you?

TBerk

Ken from Chicago

2006-07-14 08:28:40 UTC

Is this supposed to be someone famous?
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

VR, you are nutty.
Should she look like a teenage boy to look right to you?
TBerk

It's not VR's fault, obviously excessive exposure to Hollywood and fashion
mags' rail-thin actresses and models has resulted in brainwashing. We can
only hope VR can be saved ... someday.

-- Ken from Chicago

Atlas Bugged

2006-07-14 09:42:08 UTC

Post by vr
Is this supposed to be someone famous?
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

VR, you are nutty.
Should she look like a teenage boy to look right to you?

I'm with that. Folks that like Kate Moss and the ultra-skinny bod are
welcome to their preference. Amanda Tapping is not exactly my type, but she
is almost exactly the right size and shape.

I've known dozens of women who obssess over an extra ten or twenty pounds
(above "ideal,") but unless it all collects very narrowly in a single area
(which it does, unfortunately, for some people, thus throwing off the body's
aesthetic,) I usually prefer the look of the excess.

Ken from Chicago

2006-07-14 11:24:59 UTC

Post by vr
Is this supposed to be someone famous?
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

VR, you are nutty.
Should she look like a teenage boy to look right to you?

I'm with that. Folks that like Kate Moss and the ultra-skinny bod are
welcome to their preference. Amanda Tapping is not exactly my type, but
she is almost exactly the right size and shape.
I've known dozens of women who obssess over an extra ten or twenty pounds
(above "ideal,") but unless it all collects very narrowly in a single area
(which it does, unfortunately, for some people, thus throwing off the
body's aesthetic,) I usually prefer the look of the excess.

Curves are cool.

-- Ken from Chicago

DaffyDuck

2006-07-14 15:32:12 UTC

On 2006-07-14 04:24:59 -0700, "Ken from Chicago"

of women who obssess over an extra ten or twenty pounds (above
"ideal,") but unless it all collects very narrowly in a single area
(which it does, unfortunately, for some people, thus throwing off the
body's aesthetic,) I usually prefer the look of the excess.
Curves are cool.

...only to Fatties

c***@yahoo.com

2006-07-14 15:36:22 UTC

Post by DaffyDuck
On 2006-07-14 04:24:59 -0700, "Ken from Chicago"

...only to Fatties

A woman 40 lbs overweight looks better than a woman 20 lbs underweight.

Brandon

2006-07-14 22:45:29 UTC

Post by DaffyDuck
On 2006-07-14 04:24:59 -0700, "Ken from Chicago"

...only to Fatties

A woman 40 lbs overweight looks better than a woman 20 lbs underweight.
Brandon

You're high... and you are obviously trying to initiate some kind of
heated debate by saying that.

How do you deem a girl to be "underweight"? It's next to impossible,
unless you are her doctor.

You cannot judge "underweight"-- but anyone can certainly tell when a
person is overweight.

c***@yahoo.com

2006-07-14 22:51:37 UTC

Post by c***@yahoo.com
A woman 40 lbs overweight looks better than a woman 20 lbs underweight.

You cannot judge "underweight"-- but anyone can certainly tell when a
person is overweight.

I find this distinction curious and amusing.

Brandon

2006-07-14 22:58:30 UTC

Post by c***@yahoo.com
A woman 40 lbs overweight looks better than a woman 20 lbs underweight.

You cannot judge "underweight"-- but anyone can certainly tell when a
person is overweight.

I find this distinction curious and amusing.
Brandon

Maybe because it's a statement based on reality.

c***@yahoo.com

2006-07-14 23:03:10 UTC

Post by c***@yahoo.com
A woman 40 lbs overweight looks better than a woman 20 lbs underweight.

You cannot judge "underweight"-- but anyone can certainly tell when a
person is overweight.

I find this distinction curious and amusing.

Maybe because it's a statement based on reality.

Oh no, the unreality of the statement is what strikes me.

Brandon

DaffyDuck

2006-07-15 07:53:31 UTC

Post by vr
You cannot judge "underweight"-- but anyone can certainly tell when a
person is overweight.

I find this distinction curious and amusing.

Okay, so just come right out and admit you're fat, and trying to
rationalize it...

c***@yahoo.com

2006-07-15 08:56:19 UTC

Post by vr
You cannot judge "underweight"-- but anyone can certainly tell when a
person is overweight.

I find this distinction curious and amusing.

Okay, so just come right out and admit you're fat, and trying to
rationalize it...

Okay, so just come right out and admit you're skinny, and trying to
rationalize it ...

Brandon

Jette Goldie

2006-07-15 09:04:15 UTC

Post by vr
You cannot judge "underweight"-- but anyone can certainly tell when a
person is overweight.

I find this distinction curious and amusing.

Okay, so just come right out and admit you're fat, and trying to
rationalize it...

Okay, so just come right out and admit you're skinny, and trying to
rationalize it ...

Nah, he either prefers sexual partners without curves (hips, boobs, bum)
and might as well admit he would prefer a boy, or he is a necrophiliac
in denial, and really wants to bed a skeleton.

--
Jette Goldie
***@blueyonder.co.uk
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
("reply to" is spamblocked)

DaffyDuck

2006-07-15 10:26:17 UTC

Post by Jette Goldie
Nah, he either prefers sexual partners without curves (hips, boobs, bum)
and might as well admit he would prefer a boy, or he is a necrophiliac
in denial, and really wants to bed a skeleton.

Ah, there we go, speaking of fat chicks.

There is a difference of liking girls with curves in all the right
places, and pining for fatties...

DaffyDuck

2006-07-15 10:24:57 UTC

Post by c***@yahoo.com
Okay, so just come right out and admit you're skinny, and trying to
rationalize it ...

Better than being fat - interesting black & white world you live in.

Made it past puberty, yet?

~* Magda ~*

2006-07-15 10:47:52 UTC

On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 03:24:57 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, DaffyDuck
<***@spammersdie.mac.dot.com> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... On 2006-07-15 01:56:19 -0700, "***@yahoo.com" <***@yahoo.com> said:
...
... > Okay, so just come right out and admit you're skinny, and trying to
... > rationalize it ...
...
... Better than being fat - interesting black & white world you live in.
...
... Made it past puberty, yet?

Men, in general, make it past puberty six months after they die.

Why do you ask?

Bob

2006-07-15 12:33:21 UTC

Post by ~* Magda ~*
Men, in general, make it past puberty six months after they die.

That's because women enter menupause at age 11.

--
Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!

~* Magda ~*

2006-07-15 12:40:54 UTC

On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:33:21 GMT, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, ***@uce.gov (Bob) arranged some
electrons, so they looked like this:

... On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:47:52 +0200, ~* Magda ~* <***@chrisecc.dk>
... wrote:
...
... >Men, in general, make it past puberty six months after they die.
...
... That's because women enter menupause at age 11.

What the hell is menupause?

Bob

2006-07-15 13:40:06 UTC

Post by ~* Magda ~*
... >Men, in general, make it past puberty six months after they die.
... That's because women enter menupause at age 11.
What the hell is menupause?

When you stop getting menus. This is in contrast to menopause which
occurs at a much later stage in life.

You are not aware of our little insider put-on with misspelled words.
Kolker is notorious for it and I am trying to catch up with him.

I worked for a small company where the owner loved to issue memos all
the time. He went out of town and when he came back he started back
up. A secretary brought several memos by my office and I informed her
that I was sure glad we were back to getting memos every day, because
I had suffered from a severe case of memopause. Five minutes later you
could hear the entire company in laughter as she made the rounds.

--
Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!

~* Magda ~*

2006-07-15 13:52:06 UTC

On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:40:06 GMT, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, ***@uce.gov (Bob) arranged some
electrons, so they looked like this:

... On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:40:54 +0200, ~* Magda ~* <***@chrisecc.dk>
... wrote:
...
... > ... >Men, in general, make it past puberty six months after they die.
...
... > ... That's because women enter menupause at age 11.
...
... >What the hell is menupause?
...
... When you stop getting menus.

I never stopped getting menus... Mind you, I'm not 2 yet (in Jupiter years ;)).

This is in contrast to menopause which
... occurs at a much later stage in life.
...
... You are not aware of our little insider put-on with misspelled words.
... Kolker is notorious for it and I am trying to catch up with him.

I don't go to your groups, Bob. No idea who or what Kolker is.
...
... I worked for a small company where the owner loved to issue memos all
... the time. He went out of town and when he came back he started back
... up. A secretary brought several memos by my office and I informed her
... that I was sure glad we were back to getting memos every day, because
... I had suffered from a severe case of memopause. Five minutes later you
... could hear the entire company in laughter as she made the rounds.

:)

He has never heard about sending emails to his employés?

Jette Goldie

2006-07-14 23:35:45 UTC

Post by DaffyDuck
On 2006-07-14 04:24:59 -0700, "Ken from Chicago"

...only to Fatties

A woman 40 lbs overweight looks better than a woman 20 lbs underweight.
Brandon

You're high... and you are obviously trying to initiate some kind of
heated debate by saying that.
How do you deem a girl to be "underweight"? It's next to impossible,
unless you are her doctor.

When you can see bones through the skin, that's underweight. When
they cease to have the muscles they once had, lose their (already small)
bust, that's underweight.

Compare Kiera in "Bend it like Beckham" to the Pirates premiere
last week. In the first she's slim and healthy, in the latter she's
a walking skeleton.

--
Jette Goldie
***@blueyonder.co.uk
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
("reply to" is spamblocked)

rst

2006-07-15 15:03:39 UTC

Post by Jette Goldie

Post by DaffyDuck
On 2006-07-14 04:24:59 -0700, "Ken from Chicago"

...only to Fatties

A woman 40 lbs overweight looks better than a woman 20 lbs underweight.
Brandon

You're high... and you are obviously trying to initiate some kind of
heated debate by saying that.
How do you deem a girl to be "underweight"? It's next to impossible,
unless you are her doctor.

When you can see bones through the skin, that's underweight. When
they cease to have the muscles they once had, lose their (already small)
bust, that's underweight.
Compare Kiera in "Bend it like Beckham" to the Pirates premiere
last week. In the first she's slim and healthy, in the latter she's
a walking skeleton.

She looks fine. People who do not look that good just like to snark
and say "she's sick".

It makes them feel vindicated or something.

The tabloids, People, Star, etc.. know this -- and they play it up.

Then, said people read these magazines and say "See? I knew she was
sick."

It's the same thing with that made-up Aniston/Jolie "feud".

When it first went down, simple-minded people thought, "Gee, Jennifer
must hate Angelina Jolie."

The tabloids tap into that sentiment and run with it.

Now Jennifer Aniston is portrayed as the sad, jilted woman- trying to
"get on with her life", while Jolie is the "evil husband-stealer."

I can tell you this: both of those women laugh when they read this
bullshit.

Bob

2006-07-15 00:05:27 UTC

Post by vr
How do you deem a girl to be "underweight"?

Flat chested. No figure. Emaciated face. Bones showing.

The Page3 females are mostly underweight.

http://www.page3.com/gallery3/index.html

--
Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!

Stephen Fairchild

2006-07-15 01:45:27 UTC

Post by Bob

Post by vr
How do you deem a girl to be "underweight"?

Flat chested. No figure. Emaciated face. Bones showing.
The Page3 females are mostly underweight.
http://www.page3.com/gallery3/index.html

A fair number of ribcages on display, but flat-chested? You must be joking.

Keira Knightly needs to eat. I used to find her attractive but that was
before her new look. She went from lean to anorexic and the sight of her
makes me uneasy.

--
Stephen Fairchild

Forge

2006-07-15 02:30:15 UTC

Post by vr
How do you deem a girl to be "underweight"? It's next to impossible,
unless you are her doctor.

Horse shit.

Underweight:
http://wallpapers.wallpaperbase.com/celebs/portiaderossi/portia_de_rossi_
2.jpg

Loading Image...

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-07/05/xin_490703050914884
769816.jpg

See how the bones show through at the elbows, and you see bones instead
of tits on the chest area? That's underweight. Being that thin is very
dangerous to the health and well-being of a human female. Most women
that thin don't even have periods. Is that healthy? Fuck no that's not
healthy.

Stephen Fairchild

2006-07-15 10:20:18 UTC

Post by vr
How do you deem a girl to be "underweight"? It's next to impossible,
unless you are her doctor.

Horse shit.
http://wallpapers.wallpaperbase.com/celebs/portiaderossi/portia_de_rossi_
2.jpg
http://maria.blogg.se/images/nrichie2_164858453.jpg
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-07/05/xin_490703050914884
769816.jpg
See how the bones show through at the elbows, and you see bones instead
of tits on the chest area? That's underweight. Being that thin is very
dangerous to the health and well-being of a human female. Most women
that thin don't even have periods. Is that healthy? Fuck no that's not
healthy.

Please enclose long URLSs in < > brackets to stop the lines wrapping like
this, thanks.

<Loading Image...

>

<Loading Image...

--
Stephen Fairchild

DaffyDuck

2006-07-15 07:52:27 UTC

Post by c***@yahoo.com
A woman 40 lbs overweight looks better than a woman 20 lbs underweight.

Only to a fatty.

c***@yahoo.com

2006-07-15 09:00:43 UTC

Post by c***@yahoo.com
A woman 40 lbs overweight looks better than a woman 20 lbs underweight.

Only to a fatty.

Since you are attracted to women with the bodies of skinny, teenage
boys, you are welcome to them.

Having sex with a skinny woman is like jumping on a pile of wire coat
hangers.

Brandon

DaffyDuck

2006-07-15 10:27:50 UTC

Post by c***@yahoo.com
Since you are attracted to women with the bodies of skinny, teenage
boys, you are welcome to them.

Interesting take on life, you have.

Post by c***@yahoo.com
Having sex with a skinny woman is like jumping on a pile of wire coat
hangers.

How would you know, never having done so.

Forge

2006-07-15 14:00:55 UTC

Post by c***@yahoo.com
Having sex with a skinny woman is like jumping on a pile of wire coat
hangers.

Best one I ever saw was from a guy who actually did date one of those
supermodelly types and confided to his roommate, "It's like fucking a
bicycle."

Stephen Fairchild

2006-07-14 15:50:33 UTC

Post by DaffyDuck
On 2006-07-14 04:24:59 -0700, "Ken from Chicago"

...only to Fatties

I don't see fatties as having curves. They are mostly blob shaped to my
eyes. I like a nice hour glass shape without the ribs showing.

--
Stephen Fairchild

2006-07-14 22:41:59 UTC

Post by vr
Is this supposed to be someone famous?
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

VR, you are nutty.
Should she look like a teenage boy to look right to you?

I'm with that. Folks that like Kate Moss and the ultra-skinny bod are
welcome to their preference. Amanda Tapping is not exactly my type, but
she is almost exactly the right size and shape.
I've known dozens of women who obssess over an extra ten or twenty pounds
(above "ideal,") but unless it all collects very narrowly in a single area
(which it does, unfortunately, for some people, thus throwing off the
body's aesthetic,) I usually prefer the look of the excess.

Curves are cool.
-- Ken from Chicago

"Curves" is the PC way of saying "fat".

Normal size hot women, like Kate Moss, Lindsey Lohan or Kiera Knightly
have all the curves you need, with no excess baggage,

Forge

2006-07-15 02:24:55 UTC

Post by vr
"Curves" is the PC way of saying "fat".
Normal size hot women, like Kate Moss, Lindsey Lohan or Kiera Knightly
have all the curves you need, with no excess baggage,

You're insane. What do you look like? C'mon, tell.

DaffyDuck

2006-07-15 07:56:01 UTC

Post by Forge
You're insane. What do you look like? C'mon, tell.

Does it matter? You don't have to look good to appreciate good looks,
or are you saying that an overweight man MUST only like fatty chicks?

Forge

2006-07-15 13:58:43 UTC

Post by Forge
You're insane. What do you look like? C'mon, tell.

Does it matter? You don't have to look good to appreciate good looks,
or are you saying that an overweight man MUST only like fatty chicks?

Generally if you see someone saying that "chicks" must have the figure
of a mop handle in order to be attractive, you can more or less
guarantee that the guy posting it is a great wobbling gelatinous blob.

Ken from Chicago

2006-07-15 09:27:21 UTC

Post by vr
Is this supposed to be someone famous?
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

VR, you are nutty.
Should she look like a teenage boy to look right to you?

I'm with that. Folks that like Kate Moss and the ultra-skinny bod are
welcome to their preference. Amanda Tapping is not exactly my type, but
she is almost exactly the right size and shape.
I've known dozens of women who obssess over an extra ten or twenty pounds
(above "ideal,") but unless it all collects very narrowly in a single area
(which it does, unfortunately, for some people, thus throwing off the
body's aesthetic,) I usually prefer the look of the excess.

Curves are cool.
-- Ken from Chicago

"Curves" is the PC way of saying "fat".
Normal size hot women, like Kate Moss, Lindsey Lohan or Kiera Knightly
have all the curves you need, with no excess baggage,

Either you're kidding or hopelessly brainwashed by Hollywood and fashion
magazine models.

-- Ken from Chicago (who hopes for the former)

Forge

2006-07-14 03:13:27 UTC

Post by vr
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

Good God, you're completely fucking insane. Yeah, she'd look a lot
better with Keira Knightley's figure. Yeah. How about I'll keep my
gorgeous Amanda Tapping, and you go take a flying leap? 'Kay? Thanks.

2006-07-14 22:32:23 UTC

Post by vr
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

This fringe-celeb is not fat, but she is chunky.

Keira Knightly is smoking-ass hot and a half.

Have you ever seen her in person?

Forge

2006-07-15 02:21:29 UTC

Post by vr
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

This fringe-celeb is not fat, but she is chunky.
Keira Knightly is smoking-ass hot and a half.
Have you ever seen her in person?

Nobody has seen her in person; she has to stand a certain way or she
becomes invisible to the naked eye.

c***@yahoo.com

2006-07-14 15:34:22 UTC

Is this supposed to be someone famous?
She could drop 15 pounds. Maybe 20.

She's a woman, not a model.

Brandon

pwtenny

2006-07-14 04:38:31 UTC

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pwtenny/sets/1777959/

Sadly, many of these I have at much better resolutions, up around
2400x1605, but non-paying flickr accounts limit you to 1024. *shrug*

c***@yahoo.com

2006-07-14 22:59:26 UTC

So far in this tread, the two two complains against Tapping are:

"She's fat."

"She's old."

This makes me believe that those posters are only interested in skinny
teenage girls.

I didn't know Gary Glitter was able to access Usenet from prison.

Brandon

Bob

2006-07-15 00:06:57 UTC

Post by c***@yahoo.com
This makes me believe that those posters are only interested in skinny
teenage girls.

Actually they are leftist queers who want little boys.

--
Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!

Clell Harmon

2006-07-15 03:12:25 UTC