Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

From urban sustainability transformations to green gentrification: urban renewal in Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Processes aiming to achieve urban transformation that includes sustainability can result in green gentrification and thus promote exclusivist, private green spaces. At the same time, they compromise the ability of cities to promote more systemic sustainable development. Istanbul has long been a site of planned gentrification and displacement through urban renewal and regeneration projects, which have recently touted a sustainability angle. While sustainable urban renewal can have positive impacts on human health and well-being and is critical for addressing climate change and other environmental challenges, the benefits are rarely evenly distributed. Through an examination of sustainability-oriented urban renewal projects in Istanbul’s Gaziosmanpaşa district, this study shows that vulnerable residents have been displaced by the planned gentrification and that such consequences are likely to be amplified by visions of green sustainability. It also illustrates that plans to harness the city’s drive for economic growth and urban development risk making large parts of the “green” districts affordable only for relatively well-off citizens. Based on semi-structured interviews, non-participatory observation, and analysis of project and municipality-level documents, we find that even though seismic vulnerability and energy efficiency are cited as reasons for these transformations towards sustainability, policymakers are not paying sufficient attention to the political ecology of social exclusion and an increase in inequality that can result from sustainability-oriented urban renewal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

  2. Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) is the world’s longest established method of assessing, rating, and certifying the sustainability of buildings (source: www.breeam.com).

  3. The housing prices were gathered from the sale offices of the aforementioned projects.

References

  • Akçalı E, Korkut U (2015) Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: neoliberal governmentality in the EU’s semi-periphery and its limits. Polit Geogr 46:76–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkar EM (2011) Challenges and conflicts in achieving sustainable communities in historic neighbourhoods of Istanbul. Habitat Int 35:295–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Anguelovski I, Connolly JJ, Masip L, Pearsall H (2018) Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: a longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona. Urban Geogr 39:458–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Anguelovski I (2015) From toxic sites to parks as (green) LULUs? New challenges of inequity, privilege, gentrification, and exclusion for urban environmental justice. J Plan Lit 31:23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Anguelovski I, Brand AL, Chu E, Goh K (2017) Urban planning, community (re) development and environmental gentrification: Emerging challenges for green and equitable neighbourhoods. In The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Justice. Routledge, pp 449–462

  • Balaban O (2011) İnşaat Sektörü Neyin Lokomotifi. Birikim Dergisi 270:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaban O (2013) Neoliberal yeniden yapılanmanın Türkiye kentleşmesine bir diğer armağanı: Kentsel dönüşümde güncelin gerisinde kalmak. Müstesna Şehrin İstisna Hali, Sel Yayıncılık, İçinde İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianet Haber (2017) Gaziosmanpaşa’da “Kentsel Dönüşüm”ün Dört Yılı. https://m.bianet.org/bianet/kent/192850-gaziosmanpasa-da-kentsel-donusum-un-dort-yili. Accessed 28 December 2017

  • Birch EL, Wachter SM (Eds.) (2011) Global urbanization. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

  • Bryson J (2013) The nature of gentrification. Geogr Compass 7:578–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Candan AF, Kolluoglu B (2008) Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: a gated town and a public housing project in Istanbul. New Perspect Turk 39:5–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman M (2015) Spokespeople for a mute nature: the case of the Villa Rodrigo Bueno in Buenos Aires. In: Isenhour C, McDonogh G, Checker M (eds) Sustainability in the global city: myth and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom pp 238–263

  • Castree N, Kitchin R, Rogers A (2013) A dictionary of human geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaskin RJ, Joseph ML (2015) Integrating the inner city: the promise and perils of mixed-income public housing transformation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Checker M (2011) Wiped out by the “greenwave”: environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability. City Soc 23:210–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucca R (2012) The unexpected consequences of sustainability green cities between innovation and ecogentrification. Sociologica 6(2)

  • Curran W, Hamilton T (2012) Just green enough: contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. Local Environ 17:1027–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Çamlıbel ME, Alhanlıoğlu G, Uğurlu D (2015) Structural models of urban regeneration in emerging markets—Turkey case. https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/eres2015_142.content.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2016

  • Davidson M, Lees L (2005) New-build “gentrification” and London’s riverside renaissance. Environ Plan 37:1165–1190

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer I (2011) The impact of neoliberal policies on historic urban space: areas of urban renewal in Istanbul. Int Plan Stud 16:43–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooling S (2009) Ecological gentrification: a research agenda exploring justice in the city. Int J Urban Reg Res 33:621–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckerd A (2011) Clearing up without clearing out? A Spatial Assessment of Environmental Gentrification. Urban Aff Rev 47:31–59

    Google Scholar 

  • EmlakKulisi (2016) WeHaliç Dönüşümün En İyi Örneği Olacak. https://emlakkulisi.com/we-halic-donusumun-en-iyi-ornegi-olacak/501793. Accessed 17 January 2017

  • Enlil ZM (2011) The neoliberal agenda and the changing urban form of Istanbul. Int Plan Stud 16:5–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbas AE (2013) Central business district planning and the sustainable urban development process in Istanbul. The Sustainable City VIII (2 Volume Set): Urban Regeneration and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC130061.

  • Evans P (2002) Livable cities? Urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein SS (2018) Resilience and justice: planning for New York City. Urban Geogr 39:1268–1275

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald J (2010) Emerald cities: urban sustainability and economic development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantzeskaki N, Jhagroe S, Howlett M (2016) Greening the state? The framing of sustainability in Dutch infrastructure governance. Environ Sci Policy 58:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamper-Rabindran S, Timmins C (2012) Does cleanup or hazardous waste sites raise housing values? Evidence of spatially localized benefits. Duke Environmental Economica Working Paper Series. http://sites.nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/environmentaleconomics/files/2013/01/WP-EE-12-03.pdf. Accessed 15April 2017

  • Gaziosmanpaşa Strategic Plan (2015) Gaziosmanpaşa Belediyesi Stratejik Plan 2015–2019. https://www.gaziosmanpasa.bel.tr/index.php?goster=Stratejik-Plan. Accessed 15 December 2016

  • Geniş Ş (2007) Producing elite localities: the rise of gated communities in Istanbul. Urban Stud 44:771–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass R (1964) Introduction: aspects of change. In: MacKibbon K (ed) Aspects of change. Centre for Urban Studies, London, pp 13–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Goksin ZA, Yazici YE, Tore E (2015) The origins, processes and emerging outcomes of neighbourhood redevelopment in Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul. ATINER’s Conference Paper Series PLA2015–1624

  • Gould KA, Lewis TL (2016) Green gentrification: urban sustainability and the struggle for environmental justice. Routledge

  • Harnik P (2010) Urban green: innovative parks in resurgent cities. Island Press, Washington and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase D, Kabisch S, Haase A, Andersson E (2017) Greening cities—to be socially inclusive? About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities. Habitat Int 64:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2008) The right to the city. New Left Rev 53:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley A (1995) Environmental inequalities: class, race, and industrial pollution in Gary, Indiana, 1945–1980. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Hürriyet Emlak Endeksi (n.d.) İstanbul, Satılık Konut Ortalama Birim m2 Fiyat Analizi https://www.hurriyetemlak.com/Emlak-Endeksi/Detayli-Analiz/Istanbul. Accessed 10 April 2019

  • ICCAP (2016) Istanbul Climate Change Action Plan 2016–2018. https://www.iklim.istanbul. Accessed 27 January 2017

  • Isenberg A (2006) Introduction: new directions in urban environmental history. In: Isenberg A (ed) The nature of cities: culture, landscape, and urban space. University of Rochester Press, Rochester, pp 11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenhour C, McDonogh G, Checker M (2015) Sustainability in the global city: myth and practice. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • IRP (2014) Istanbul Regional Plan for 2014–2023. https://www.istka.org.tr/media/1063/2014-2023-İstanbul-bölge-planı.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2016

  • Istanbul Earthquake Report (2017) http://www.hkmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/5f7ffbe381b4675_ek.pdf?tipi=3&turu=D&sube=6. Accessed 09 May 2017

  • IMM (2009) Updating of earthquake risk assessment. https://www.ibb.gov.tr/tr-TR/SubSites/DepremSite/Documents/İstanbul Deprem HTÇ_NİSAN 2012.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2017

  • IMSP (2015) Istanbul Metropolitan Strategic Plan for 2015–2019. http://www.ibb.gov.tr/enUS/Organization/Birimler/StratejikPlanlamaMd/Documents/stratejik_plan_2015-2019.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2016

  • İGEP (2011) İç Göç Entegrasyon Projesi. https://www.ab.gov.tr/_46071.html Accessed14 May 2017

  • Karaman O (2013) Urban renewal in Istanbul: reconfigured spaces, robotic lives. Int J Urban Reg Res 37:715–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardan O, Gozdyra P, Misic B et al (2015) Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center. Sci Report 5:11610

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlenzig W, Marquardt F, White P, Yaseen R, Young R (2007) How green is your city? The SustainLane US city rankings. New Society Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyder C (2005) Globalization and social exclusion in Istanbul. Int J Urban Reg Res 29:124–134

    Google Scholar 

  • KEYM. (n.d.) Socio economic analyses. http://www.keym.com.tr/en/service-offers/socio-economical-analyses. Accessed 14 April 2017

  • Kocabas A, Gibson MS (2011) Planned gentrification in Istanbul: the Sulukule renewal area 2005-2010. Int J Sustain Dev Plan 6:420–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe J, Wüstemann H (2014) Estimating the value of urban green space: a hedonic pricing analysis of the housing market in cologne, Germany. FoliaOeconomica 5:45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuokkanen A, Yazar M (2018) Cities in sustainability transition: comparing Helsinki and Istanbul. Sustainability 5:1421

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtuluş H (2011) Gated communities as a representation of new upper and middle class in Istanbul. DergiPark J Polit Sci 44 http://dergipark.gov.tr/iusiyasal/issue/594/5978. Accessed 13 April 2017

  • Kuyucu T, Unsal O (2010) ‘Urban transformation’ as state-led property transfer: an analysis of two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Stud 47:1479–1499

    Google Scholar 

  • LEED ND (2018) LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development. https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/LEED v4 ND_07.2.18_current.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2017

  • Lelandais G (2014) Space and identity in resistance against neoliberal urban planning in Turkey. Int J Urban Reg Res 38:1785

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovering J, Türkmen H (2011) Bulldozer neo-liberalism in Istanbul: the state-led construction of property markets, and the displacement of the urban poor. Int Plan Stud 16:73–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugo A (2018) Bicycle/race: transportation, culture & resistance. Microcosm Publishing, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah A (2012) Demolition for development: a critical analysis of official urban imaginaries in past and present UK cities. J Hist Sociol 25:151–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Melosi M (1999) The sanitary city: urban infrastructure in America from colonial times to the present. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Misal Project (n.d.) http://www.misalistanbul.com Accessed 24 February 2018

  • MoEU (Ministry of Environment and Urbanisation) (2018) İlan Edilen Riskli Alanlar. http://istanbulakdm.csb.gov.tr/ilan-edilen-riskli-alanlar-i-3598. Accessed 21 July 2018

  • NEEAP (2017) National Energy Efficiency Action Plan for 2017–2023. http://www.yegm.gov.tr/document/20180102M1_2018_eng.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2017

  • Patel V (2015) Going green? Washing stones in world-class Delhi. In: Isenhour C, McDonogh G, Checker M (eds) Sustainability in the global city: myth and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom pp 82–105

  • Pearsall H (2010) From brown to green? Assessing social vulnerability to environmental gentrification in New York city. Environ Plann C:Politics and Space 28:872–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Quastel N (2009) Political ecologies of gentrification. Urban Geogr 30:694–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg AL (2014) Environmental gentrification in a post-industrial landscape: the case of the Limhamn quarry, Malmö, Sweden. Int J Justice Sustain 19:1068–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleifer Y (2013) Is Turkey becoming a “constructocracy”? https://eurasianet.org/is-turkey-becoming-a-constructocracy. Accessed 12 April 2017

  • Schuetze T, Chelleri L (2015) Urban sustainability versus green-washing: fallacy and reality of urban regeneration in downtown Seoul. Sustainability 8:33. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sham F (2012) The urban political ecologies of Vancouver: sustainable development and affordability. A thesis presented to the faculty of architecture, planning, and preservation. Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University

  • Smith N (2002) New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode 34:427–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Starecheski A (2014) What was squatting, and what comes next? The mystery of property in New York City, 81–2014. The City University of New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw E (2010) Apocalypse forever?: post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory Cult Soc 28:214–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr J (1996) The search for the ultimate sink: urban pollution in historical perspective. The University of Akron Press, Akron

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk Stat (Turkish Statistical Institute) (2011) Population and housing census 2011, Publication No: 4030. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk Stat (Turkish Statistical Institute) (2016) Address based population registration system results. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1059. Accessed 18 January 2017

  • Turk Stat (Turkish Statistical Institute) (2018) The Results of Address Based Population Registration System. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/HbGetirHTML.do?id=30709. Accessed 12 Feb 2019

  • Turkish Central Bank (TCMB) (2019) Housing price index for Istanbul. https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/21c8c007-4006-45ee-bbc2-852f396a23f0/HPI-HHPI.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-21c8c007-4006-45ee-bbc2-852f396a23f0-mCgAcw6. Accessed 10 April 2019

  • Türkün A (2011) Urban regeneration and hegemonic power relationships. Int Plan Stud 16:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2015) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/. Accessed 15 May 2016

  • UNHABITAT (2009) Advisory group on forced evictions mission to Istanbul, Republic of Turkey. http://mirror.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/10008_1_593995.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2017

  • Usta HT (2017) Başkanımızın Mesajı. https://www.gaziosmanpasa.bel.tr/index.php?goster=Baskanimizin-Mesaji. Accessed 17 January 2017

  • Usta HT, Ulger NE, Iban C (2015) Urban regeneration projects in Istanbul: Gaziosmanpaşa case. https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2015/papers/ts01i/TS01I_usta_ulger_et_al_7750.pdf. Accessed 09 August 2016

  • Uysal UE (2012) An urban social movement challenging urban regeneration: the case of Sulukule, Istanbul. Cities 29:12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • WeHaliç Project (n.d.) http://www.wehalic.com/index.php/kampanya#. Accessed 12 May 2017

  • Yılmaz B. (2008) Entrapped in multidimensional exclusion: the perpetuation of poverty among conflict-induced migrants in an Istanbul neighbourhood. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge core/content/view/S0896634600004982. Accessed 05 February 2016

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants to the two workshops held in Istanbul and to the intervieewes. This paper benefited from the thoughtful comments of three anonymous reviewers.

Funding

This research is part of the EU-funded H2020 project GREEN-WIN - Green Growth and and Win-Win Strategies for Sustainable Climate Action (Grant Agreement No 642018; https://www.green-win-project.eu).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Mahir Yazar

  2. Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK

    Dina Hestad, Yuge Ma & Thomas F. Thornton

  3. Neoma Business School, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France

    Diana Mangalagiu

  4. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ali Kerem Saysel

Authors
  1. Mahir Yazar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dina Hestad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diana Mangalagiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ali Kerem Saysel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuge Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas F. Thornton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahir Yazar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of a Special Issue on Win-Win Solutions to Climatic Change edited by Diana Mangalagiu, Alexander Bisaro, Jochen Hinkel, and Joan David Tàbara

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 70 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yazar, M., Hestad, D., Mangalagiu, D. et al. From urban sustainability transformations to green gentrification: urban renewal in Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul. Climatic Change 160, 637–653 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02509-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02509-3

Search

Navigation