2. Scope Of The Project
The strict noise regulations around major airports due to
environmental concern have made jet noise a crucial
problem in present day aero-acoustics research.
The three main acoustic sources in aircraft are aerodynamics
noise, noise from aircraft systems and engine and mechanical
noise.
Among these noise sources engine noise contribute more
noise pollution to environment.
3. NOISE REDUCTION METHOD
• Chevron nozzles
Chevrons are the saw
tooth patterns on the trailing
edges of some jet
engine nozzles that are used
for noise reduction.
4. DESIGN OF ROUNDED NOZZLE
In the current study, a 3” diameter round converging-
diverging (CD) supersonic nozzle was designed using a method-of-
characteristics to provide ideal expansion or shock free flow at the
nozzle exit. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the round nozzle
interior contour and a photo of the nozzle mounted at the
termination of the ART centerline piping. The screen located
upstream of the nozzle in the photo covers the suction system used
to control boundary layer thickness on the exterior of the piping
leading to the nozzle. A secondary flow pipe used for dual stream
jet noise studies is embedded behind the screen although it is
capped off in the current configuration.
S
5. DESIGN OF CHEVRON NOZZLE
A chevron nozzle was also designed as a variant of
the mj=1.5 CD nozzle. The chevrons are configured
as extensions to the 3” diameter CD nozzle with a
one degree angle of penetration into the flow.
Figure 3 shows a schematic of the nozzle interior
contour and a photo of the chevron nozzle. The
nozzle equivalent exit area, represented by the
projected downstream area, is reduced by 6% due to
the penetration.
6. DESIGN IMPORTANCE
The comprehensives experimental studies at NASA reveal that the
chevron modification to the round nozzle can bring as much as 3 db
reduction in peak noise during take-off with less than 0.5 % thrust loss
during cruise. They reported that for high frequencies and large angles
to the jet, the use of chevrons may also lead about to 2 db noise
increase.
11. RESULTS DISCUSSION
It is apparent from the numerical results presented here so far that a nozzle with
chevron shows an appreciable sound reduction of the supersonic jet on the order of
4.13% while comparing with the base model with 0.6% thrust loss.
While comparing with other chevron nozzles we have observed that chevron
nozzles shows higher acoustic level than the base model.
It indicates that chevron nozzles will defeat the very purpose of its objective for jet
noise reduction.
We comprehended that prudent selection of chevron geometry is a meaningful
objective for the jet noise reduction without scuttling the vehicle performance.
12. CONCLUSION
We have concluded that the shape optimizations of chevron nozzle have a
potential for reduction of turbulent mixing noise, which is believed to be the
dominant component of jet noise for most aircraft.
We also concluded that the chevron is the best choice for the sound
reduction, of the acoustic power level of the base model of the nozzle, on the
order of 6 db.
We also concluded that the prudent selection of chevron will enable the
designer to reduce the sound level on the order of ~5%.
It is emphasized that jet noise remains a major component of engine noise and
the chevron technology has provided a modest relief for jet noise reduction in
aerospace applications.